To E or Not to E?

Winter 2012

By Richard Barbieri

Reluctant as I was to move from print to byte, I decided my book review for the winter issue was the right time to delve into e-books, so I read half this group on my iPad, and also tried a few novels, other nonfiction, and classics. Would my doubts about e-books stand up?

I found real advantages to e-books. Bulk is one: I have a few dozen books on my iPad, with room for hundreds more, and I can give away both books and bookshelves and still have space for the rest of my life’s reading. With e-books, I may never again find myself bookless — a wifi spot is all it takes to reload. I now have free e-versions of favorite poets and novelists who are in the public domain, as well as all of Shakespeare, readily at hand. 

There’s more. If I forget my reading glasses, large print is a click away. Can’t remember a particular person or character in an un-indexed novel or memoir when they reappear a hundred pages down the line? I just search for the name and look for their first appearance. Need a definition? Kindle and iBooks software can provide one instantly — though many older words stump both. iBooks can also let me leap into the Web to explore further data — a blessing for the curious and a curse for the distractible (I’m both). I can highlight text and write notes on “pages” without guilt for marking a book. And of course, on my iPad, I can read in the dark. 

For a reader, print has only a few advantages. Books never need recharging, can stand up to more physical abuse — even getting wet and drying out again — often fit in pockets, are somewhat easier to flip through than e-books, and give a physical feel of progress through the pages.

So, why not give up printed books completely? The answer, for me, is surprising: It’s not books’ souls that make the difference; it’s their bodies. I cannot imagine an e-book attracting me because of its cover art, or its quality of paper. Anthony Powell titled one of his novels Books Do Furnish A Room, but e-books never will. 

Having bodies, books have histories. Picking up a book, you can remember when and where you bought it and the places you read it. And recalling where I began a particular book — The Return of the Native on a subway platform in Brooklyn, Angela’s Ashes on a flight from Miami to Lima — somehow adds to the reading experience. There is also pleasure in simply looking at a volume that has been in your family for generations. You can also pass it on to your children or a friend.

One bookstore owner recently told a New York Times reporter that customers often say, “I read this book on my Kindle and now I want to own it.” Can you ever really feel you own an e-book? You can’t lend it to a friend, donate it to a charity sale, or sell it if you discover it’s a valuable first edition. 

Finally, buying “real” books brings you into the orbit of other human bodies — and sometimes souls as well. I don’t ever want to lose the pleasure of entering a favorite or newly discovered bookstore, scanning the shelves and tables, sitting with a book and a coffee, asking staff for recommendations, giving or getting suggestions from another customer, or attending a reading or book signing. 

When I first read Plato, I believed his claim that the body interfered with the mind’s quest to know truth. At the time, I wished I didn’t have to hold a book up, find a comfortable position, or locate adequate light, but could just absorb texts in some inexplicable visual or extrasensory way. Now that I can almost do so, I realize how naïve that view was. Only angels learn instantly and intuitively. We humans have bodies — and books — because they suit our nature, and always will. As Richard Wilbur said, “Love calls us to the things of this world.” Including books.

Richard Barbieri

Richard Barbieri spent 40 years as teacher and administrator in independent schools. He can be reached at [email protected].